3 ms·
Sure, but abolishing all corpyright means that owned by corporations too. Let's see microsoft's source code. It won't be of quality, but as soon as that will be
by gumballindie 3y ago
Sure, but abolishing all corpyright means that owned by corporations too. Let's see microsoft's source code. It won't be of quality, but as soon as that will be used for training ml i would agree to mine being used.
- Wytwwww 3y agoWhy would they ever show it to anyone? Without copyright we'll go back to the middle ages with every craftsman/(modern equivalent) hiding their methods, techniques and technologies from everyone else the best they can (and consequently way less innovation). Also, we'd no longer have any movies, almost no books, music etc. bug I guess literally returning to the dark ages is what these silly "abolish all copyright" people want.
- zlg_codes 3y ago[flagged]
- Wytwwww 3y ago> We had culture before currency, guys. Sure, just like we had land vehicles before trains and automobiles. I doubt most people would be particularly enthusiastic about going back to horse-carts (of course some like you wouldn't have any issues with that just to prove some delusional points) this is no different whatsoever. > With the availability of tools and reverse-engineering techniques, nothing is truly secret anymore. The implications of that being? > copyright cartel. I assure you that corporations would do a lot better than individuals or small-scale professional content creators. e.g. if there were no copyright Amazon and publishers (the ones who survive) would still throw a few pennies towards some authors but they (the authors) would be in an inconceivably weaker position that they are now.