3 ms·
The scenario you present in the parent comment has echoes of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle_America,_Inc https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G
by mnahkies 3y ago
The scenario you present in the parent comment has echoes of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle_America,_Inc https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle_America.... - if I recall correctly they did "clean room" re-implementations of the same public API surfaces which in some cases resulted in identical implementations.
To my understanding if some piece of code is the only / obvious way to solve a problem it's not an issue.
To use a trivial example there's only so many ways you can implement a sum contents of array function, I'd imagine for many security vulnerabilities it'll be similar - adding a bounds check or whatever isn't going to be problematic just because you weren't first.
- JCharante 3y agoOkay, nice. I didn't know there were identical implementations in that case, I just thought it was about the method signatures being identical (because that's necessary when it's API Compatible).