3 ms·
> It becomes worthless for... So you admit it's not completely worthless at that point only for specific use cases.
by admax88qqq 3y ago
> It becomes worthless for...
So you admit it's not completely worthless at that point only for specific use cases.
- jiggawatts 3y agoSure, it has uses: it can be printed on a T-shirt to teach big media a lesson about the futility of copy protection, etc…
- admax88qqq 3y agoPlus it lets people decrypt media encrypted by that key that they might otherwise have been unable to. So we've established that a "private key" that is no longer private may still have uses to some people, it is not wholly "worthless." Do you want to revise your earlier statement about the private key in the repo in question? Is it "worthless"? Is it a security problem? Do you know what that key is being used for?