16 ms·
Law enforcement should be free, or at least paid for by generic taxes. If I host a movie night with some friends, and an altercation occurs between them, then
by spacebanana7 3y ago
Law enforcement should be free, or at least paid for by generic taxes.
If I host a movie night with some friends, and an altercation occurs between them, then it's unjust for the police to create unreasonable cost on me as a host. They shouldn't tear up the house or create lots of time consuming paperwork without compensation.
You may think that my movie nights are inherently a danger to society. But even if that's correct, we should create direct legislation to discourage this dangerous activity rather than using search processes/warrants to impose cost in an approximate and roundabout way.
- lnxg33k1 3y agoYou’re not a company, if you host a movie night privately its different than a company that handles and has the responsibility of the personal data of millions of people, I am not even sure wtf I am reading, do you guys even consider scale and contexts when writing things or just throw random examples around But also the cost for you would be the time to call law enforcement, for them is the time to verify the validity of a document, so its just nonsense
- spacebanana7 3y agoI’m trying to emphasise that safety legislation should operate through direct legislation whenever possible. Large companies can face massive civil & criminal liabilities for mishandling personal data, whilst also being made whole for the administrative cost of cooperating with law enforcement.