3 ms·

I’m not speculating about that. I’m saying; if you’re covering a court case, don’t go off on a tangent and start saying things which are misleading or false wi

I’m not speculating about that. I’m saying; if you’re covering a court case, don’t go off on a tangent and start saying things which are misleading or false with regard to the case. > I think… This is precisely my point. Most people don’t care what I think; or, you, or the OP on this topic. Opinions are thick and fast. What people care about is what the court rules.

surfacedetail 3y ago
>I’m saying; if you’re covering a court case, don’t go off on a tangent and start saying things which are misleading or false with regard to the case. This adds the caveat "as far as I can tell". That's a caveat that the capability to produce Getty outputs has been removed, it can be tested and amended if new information comes to light. >What people care about is what the court rules. Courts also rely on experts and expert testimony, the judge here is even citing a law professor's opinion. The idea that judges never rely on legal experts and commentators is strange.