4 ms·
Stable Diffusion isn't a human being. It's not even sentient. It's a system designed to synthesize images, and it was trained using images authored by human bei
by kevingadd 3y ago
Stable Diffusion isn't a human being. It's not even sentient. It's a system designed to synthesize images, and it was trained using images authored by human beings - without the rightsholders' consent. This has nothing to do with lobotomies. You have rights as a human that a piece of software does not have.
I don't understand why I keep seeing people roll stuff out like 'should I be lobotomized' as some sort of attempt to distract from this just being a dispute over copyright minimalism/maximalism.
- artninja1988 3y agoAnd the people training stabile diffusion shouldn't need the authors consent to train on their works.
- monocasa 3y agoCopyright has always made a distinction between the copies you make in a person's head and the copies you make into another work generated by a person.