4 ms·
The answer seems kind of low quality, but it got further than others. It could probably self correct.
by beacon294 3y ago
The answer seems kind of low quality, but it got further than others. It could probably self correct.
- taneq 3y agoI don’t know too many humans who could answer that half as well.
- quickthrower2 3y agoTo be fair it is a memory/recite test mostly. “Define this”
- epcoa 3y ago"For example, the addition of two numbers, 2+2, can be seen as a repeated application of the multiplication operation," I bet most humans ever born did not know what the word "multiplication" meant. Not sure how your metric is useful.
- philipswood 3y agoSometimes, to achieve some perspective, I also zoom out and declare normal over the estimated +-120,000,000,000 people who have ever lived.
- epcoa 3y agoI think the point went over your head (which just further proves mine). Hint: Perhaps read the original output more carefully: "For example, the addition of two numbers, 2+2, can be seen as a repeated application of the multiplication operation,". Or are you counted in the majority of that 120,000,000,000?
- philipswood 3y agoParis in the the spring