3 ms·

I think the prevailing problem is that quality software often doesn't outperform shit software in terms of revenue, right?

• benreesman 3y ago
  CloudFlare and TailScale and that crowd don’t seem to be chancing it?
  • bottled_poe 3y ago
    They are outliers. Most startups focus on feature velocity and sales first, quality is an afterthought, regardless of what they might say. Also, if your project is open source, quality has a lot more weight towards uptake.
• foobiekr 3y ago
  It's not that, it's that quality doesn't matter and mostly neither does technology. If you are doing network switches or GPUs or server CPUs or whatever, yeah, technology matters. If you are building pretty much any SaaS, MCCA, etc. the tech is literally irrelevant and mostly the more "new" tech you use the worse off you are. Quality also only matters in some contexts and those are even rarer than the above. Timing and solving a problem is all that matters in terms of revenue. As long as you aren't too bad, it's fine. The only real five-nines requirement for SaaS is that 99.999% of them would be fine with one or two nines.
  • valenterry 3y ago
    That's not true at all. Very often I've seen features being delayed or completely disregarded due to technology decisions. It then looks like it was a "business reason" in the end, but it's not so easy to just distinguish what the root cause really was.