3 ms·
what… is the point of this article? some randos raised “concerns”? classic journo-trash. not a cybertruck afficionado by any means, but… come the fuck on.
by keeganpoppen 3y ago
what… is the point of this article? some randos raised “concerns”? classic journo-trash. not a cybertruck afficionado by any means, but… come the fuck on.
- richbell 3y ago> what… is the point of this article? some randos raised “concerns”? classic journo-trash. not a cybertruck afficionado by any means, but… come the fuck on. "randos" such as the former acting head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and a George Washington University auto safety professor.
- darkwraithcov 3y ago[flagged]
- cqqxo4zV46cp 3y ago[flagged]
- senectus1 3y agoI take it you're American? Some countries and cultures around the world have very different closely held thoughts about pedestrian safety. as much as I personally like the thing (though its a little big in my opinion), I am in agreeance that it would not be allowed on Australian roads. Its just not safe enough by our standards.