3 ms·
How are you going to make a case for tortious interference when the would be interferee is profiting by using the interferer’s resources without payment?
by willseth 3y ago
How are you going to make a case for tortious interference when the would be interferee is profiting by using the interferer’s resources without payment?
- goodluckchuck 3y agoFrom beepers website, there’s no use of apples servers when iMessages are sent from a beeper user to a beeper user. Rather, they only pass through Apple when sent to an iPhone user and in that case it’s the iPhone user that’s utilizing apples resources. And in that case there’s an Apple device owner, who is paid for the right to use iMessage servers.
- willseth 3y agoWow that’s a hell of a stretch, but A+ for effort I guess. By that logic, they’re only stealing 50% of Apple’s iMessage resources for iPhone users.
- tedunangst 3y agoWell, obviously, if those messages aren't using Apple's servers, then Apple hasn't stopped them, so there's no interference.