4 ms·
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Can you back any of this up, or provide a reason I should believe what you’re saying? Because it directly c
by liamwire 3y ago
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Can you back any of this up, or provide a reason I should believe what you’re saying? Because it directly contradicts decades of research on what is perhaps the most scrutinised and studied dietary supplement in the world.
Aspartame is safe, and very well tolerated.
You’re spreading misinformation.
- willmadden 3y agoYou are the one spreading misinformation. Aspartame is horrible for you. Here, have a read. I have more if you would like them. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003950 https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/jo... https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220324143800.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220324143800.h... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1392232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1392232/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964906/pdf/ehp0115-001293.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964906/pdf/ehp0... http://www.mpwhi.com/soffritti_2010_20896_fta.pdf http://www.mpwhi.com/soffritti_2010_20896_fta.pdf https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-021-00725-y https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-... https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/10.5334/aogh.4163 https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/10.5334/aogh.4163 http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/96/6/1419.long http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/96/6/1419.long https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436139 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436139 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2213120119 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2213120119 https://news.fsu.edu/news/university-news/2022/12/08/fsu-research-links-common-sweetener-with-anxiety/ https://news.fsu.edu/news/university-news/2022/12/08/fsu-res... https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-41213-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-41213-2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8939194 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8939194 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCoBuTr0Or0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCoBuTr0Or0 http://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/28/E929 http://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/28/E929 https://www.statnews.com/2017/07/17/artificial-sweeteners-weight-loss/ https://www.statnews.com/2017/07/17/artificial-sweeteners-we... https://blogs.wsj.com/experts/2017/09/14/why-one-cardiologist-has-drunk-his-last-diet-soda/ https://blogs.wsj.com/experts/2017/09/14/why-one-cardiologis... https://www.philly.com/philly/health/this-cardiologist-wants-his-family-to-cut-back-on-diet-soda-should-yours-too-20170912.html https://www.philly.com/philly/health/this-cardiologist-wants... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129676 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129676 http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2017/04/20/STROKEAHA.116.016027 http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2017/04/20/STROK... https://www.bumc.bu.edu/busm/2017/04/20/daily-consumption-of-sodas-fruit-juices-and-artificially-sweetened-sodas-affect-brain/ https://www.bumc.bu.edu/busm/2017/04/20/daily-consumption-of... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/04/21/study-links-diet-soda-to-higher-risk-of-stroke-dementia/?utm_term=.2bfedb009058 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/04/2... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24787915 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24787915 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24787917 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24787917 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1579221 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1579221 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474447/pdf/envhper00434-0053.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474447/pdf/env... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28198207 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28198207 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17684524 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17684524 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661805001404 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661805... https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/doi/10.2337/dc23-0206/153434/Artificial-Sweeteners-and-Risk-of-Type-2-Diabetes https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/doi/10.2337/dc23-0... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27997218 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27997218 http://www.massgeneral.org/News/pressrelease.aspx?id=2016 http://www.massgeneral.org/News/pressrelease.aspx?id=2016 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3772345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3772345/
- sethrin 3y agoFor anyone else reading this, feel free to ignore this person's post. If there's a good case to be made that aspartame is harmful, this isn't it. Few of these studies are germane to typical human exposure, and typical exposure levels aren't strongly correlated with large increases in risk. For the author, try reading some of these papers. Also don't bother linking to press releases or newspaper articles, you're just wasting other people's time. You probably want to skip the animal studies too. Go for no more than three links, preferably meta-studies -- at least if your intention is to be taken for something other than a crank.