4 ms·
> but you've made it clear that you have no problems with child abuse, anti-Semitism, or hypocrisy. What an absurdly childish response to GP’s comments. GP has
by jmye 3y ago
> but you've made it clear that you have no problems with child abuse, anti-Semitism, or hypocrisy.
What an absurdly childish response to GP’s comments. GP has made none of those things “clear” and it’s disgusting that you would stoop to such a gross, inflammatory accusation because you’re upset about an internet argument.
Grow up or log off. This crap is a really, really ugly look for you.
- shark_laser 3y agolol, gotcha. It's an ugly look for me to suggest that someone has strange priorities if they're defending Disney for paying money to an antisemetic company that distributes child abuse material? I guess we're only allowed to judge antisemetic companies if they're owned by Elon Musk... It's an ugly look for you to look the other way. Silence is violence remember.
- jmye 3y agoNo one you’ve responded to is defending Disney. No one is looking the other way. They’re telling you that you’re conflating unrelated things. You spinning that into “actually that means you approved of CSAM” is teenage Twitter bullshit, frankly. Again, grow up.
- shark_laser 3y ago[flagged]