5 ms·
So you’re claiming a lack of proof of harm is proof of safety? I’d recommend reading up on fallacious arguments.
by flextheruler 3y ago
So you’re claiming a lack of proof of harm is proof of safety? I’d recommend reading up on fallacious arguments.
- m_dupont 3y agoI think his point is more like the following: every day we have the chance to observe thousands of thousands of circumcised men and we have been doing this for thousands of men, and so far, nobody has noticed any emotional issues with them. it's not fallacious, its simply saying that we've (informally) looked at a lot of data and found nothing. I.e. evidence of absence