4 ms·
Sure, not a medical procedure. It's really a religious ritual. I only support it when the baby was born to the "tribe" that performs it during infancy (the Jews
by hereme888 3y ago
Sure, not a medical procedure. It's really a religious ritual. I only support it when the baby was born to the "tribe" that performs it during infancy (the Jews, some Christians, etc). After all, who are we to tell a culture about their customs, especially for a very safe procedure.
At least they slightly acknowledge the benefits of neonatal circumcision:
> "The present research is framed within the context of developmental and socio-affective psychology. Therefore, questions about whether neonatal circumcision.... is associated with therapeutic benefit (e.g., reduction in sexually transmitted and urinary tract infections as well as penile cancer.... fall outside the scope of this research.
- rkfjrjrkfnrkd 3y ago[flagged]