4 ms·
This list is strange because their methodology excludes :"The ranking excludes first-generation fortunes and those fortunes controlled by a single heir."
by TheCaptain4815 3y ago
This list is strange because their methodology excludes :"The ranking excludes first-generation fortunes and those fortunes controlled by a single heir."
- minitoar 3y agoI think they’re trying to limit it to “families” being more than 1 generation and more than 1 person.
- TheCaptain4815 3y agoYeah I guess they're trying for a more "old money vibe", but still doesn't make sense given the title.
- bilbo0s 3y agoOf course, "fortunes controlled by a single heir" is almost the epitome of old money. But I understand if that person is single then maybe that's not a family. At the same time, his/her money came from, well, family. So it's just a little confusing.
- paulddraper 3y agoNo if actually "old" then it's multiple people
- bcrosby95 3y agoThe exact opposite. There's over 70 heirs to the Rockefeller fortune. One of them was in my World of Warcraft guild. You've never heard of her.