3 ms·
Congrats, you just speared the stupidity of the libertarian dream in a sentence. As a pharmacist, it's terrifying that anyone is even broaching the idea of endi
by 303uru 3y ago
Congrats, you just speared the stupidity of the libertarian dream in a sentence. As a pharmacist, it's terrifying that anyone is even broaching the idea of ending the FDA and putting all medications OTC.
- friend_and_foe 3y agoWell, prior to the modern age, people self medicated. All compounds were freely available in most countries. You didn't need anyone's permission to find them and take them. Was it better? I don't know. I doubt you'd have many of the extremely effective medicines that have been invented since then. But I also don't think restricting medications has done anything to help curb addiction for example, and in my opinion the situation we live in where people just assume something is safe just because it's on the shelf of a store is a bad outcome of outsourcing personal safety to a government agency. I'm very diligent about what I put into my body, and I think most people would also be if they realized they needed to be, most people have a false sense of security as an adverse side effect of governments taking the role of claiming something is safe. I like not having lead in my turmeric, I like being able to see what's in my food by looking at the label. But I don't like having to pay someone a few hundred bucks just to get permission to numb some acute pain I feel from time to time due to a chronic condition. I skirt that law using a "supplement", but I don't think I should have to. All in all I think there's room for improvement. A lot of room. I'm not quite ready to say the government shouldn't have anything to say about the way things are done but I am ready to say they should have a much less prominent role.