2 ms·
I didn’t fully read this, but superficially I don’t see a difference between this and AI explained’s recent video. Maybe it is better in text form than video fo
by hdhdhdhdhdhd 3y ago
I didn’t fully read this, but superficially I don’t see a difference between this and AI explained’s recent video. Maybe it is better in text form than video for some, but it feels plagiarised given the similarities and the popularity of the AI explained channel.
- brandall10 3y agoI love AI Explained, but is a 200k sub channel really that influential in the industry?
- time0ut 3y agoI have noticed a trend with Ars posting original articles with a lot of similarities to content from smaller sources that came out a few days earlier. Its pretty common to see a rather esoteric topic make it to the front page of HN and then a similar article showing up on Ars a bit later. I assume their authors are mining HN and similar places for ideas. Not saying that happened here or that it is ever plagiarism. Just something I noticed as a daily Ars and HN reader.