4 ms·

US constitution and major free speech cases. By the way, I reject the consequences framing. Everything has a consequence. I breathe. Oxygen enters my bloodstre

US constitution and major free speech cases. By the way, I reject the consequences framing. Everything has a consequence. I breathe. Oxygen enters my bloodstream. The only question tends to be whether a busybody has too much free time on their hands to undermine basic foundations of this country. And there seem to be so many of those lately. Related. What government thinks freedom of speech is and is not based on various rulings: [1]https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-re...

CyberDildonics 3y ago
Freedom of speech does not include the right: To permit students to print articles in a school newspaper over the objections of the school administration. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
- A4ET8a8uTh0 3y ago
  It is mildly amusing isn't it. Not that long ago schools were kinda for trying to uphold freedoms of their students. I do not want to presume too much, but I am assuming you are trying to make some sort of subtle point. If so, do not hesitate to do it and just play your cards. It is not like I can report you for anti-semitism or something.
  - CyberDildonics 3y ago
    I'm not trying to be subtle at all, I'm trying to tell you explicitly that "freedom of speech" has to do with the government and has nothing to do with you getting banned from websites or people blocking you. From your own link it doesn't cover being able to print whatever you want in college newspaper. People not wanting to hear what you have to say, broadcast what you say or host what you say has nothing to do with freedom of speech.
    - A4ET8a8uTh0 3y ago
      Is it one of those weird moments where we push this conversation to it its logical conclusion with a response of blocking protected parties and immediate chorus of 'but you can't block like that!' You can only block the right people that we tell you can block. Blocking wrong people can be bad mojo. FWIW, this was my last response. I am removing myself from this conversation.
      - CyberDildonics 3y ago
        That's for the best, I have absolutely zero idea what you are trying to say.

CyberDildonics 3y ago

Freedom of speech does not include the right: To permit students to print articles in a school newspaper over the objections of the school administration. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).

A4ET8a8uTh0 3y ago
It is mildly amusing isn't it. Not that long ago schools were kinda for trying to uphold freedoms of their students. I do not want to presume too much, but I am assuming you are trying to make some sort of subtle point. If so, do not hesitate to do it and just play your cards. It is not like I can report you for anti-semitism or something.
- CyberDildonics 3y ago
  I'm not trying to be subtle at all, I'm trying to tell you explicitly that "freedom of speech" has to do with the government and has nothing to do with you getting banned from websites or people blocking you. From your own link it doesn't cover being able to print whatever you want in college newspaper. People not wanting to hear what you have to say, broadcast what you say or host what you say has nothing to do with freedom of speech.
  - A4ET8a8uTh0 3y ago
    Is it one of those weird moments where we push this conversation to it its logical conclusion with a response of blocking protected parties and immediate chorus of 'but you can't block like that!' You can only block the right people that we tell you can block. Blocking wrong people can be bad mojo. FWIW, this was my last response. I am removing myself from this conversation.
    - CyberDildonics 3y ago
      That's for the best, I have absolutely zero idea what you are trying to say.