4 ms·
Yeah I think that's correct. The unions here are not acting as representatives of Tesla workers to negotiate with Tesla, but rather as cartels trying to preven
by fallingknife 3y ago
Yeah I think that's correct. The unions here are not acting as representatives of Tesla workers to negotiate with Tesla, but rather as cartels trying to prevent two willing parties (Tesla and its employees) from doing business without cutting in the union.
I had no idea that unions could operate like this. I thought unions were tools to gain workers leverage against their employers, which I obviously support. I find this cartel action repulsive and I don't see how it could be done here in the US without violating anti trust.
- soco 3y agoSo you support workers gaining leverage with the help of unions, but when the workers actually try gaining leverage with the help of unions, you call them names. That's not exactly showing "support" is it?
- SwedishExpat 3y ago> The unions here are not acting as representatives of Tesla workers to negotiate with Tesla, but rather as cartels trying to prevent two willing parties (Tesla and its employees) from doing business without cutting in the union. Out of interest, how are the unions trying to cut in? And what exactly are they "cutting in"?
- oblio 3y agoSo if union do stuff, they should be targeted by anti trust but if companies do it, nothing should happen? My God, so many people have been taught to have themselves. It's just sad at this point.