> Companies will put whichever labels they feel are required because they are still liable for the problems their products cause. This is basic and standard tor

> Companies will put whichever labels they feel are required because they are still liable for the problems their products cause. This is basic and standard tort law, no change required here. Company gets sued because warning is missing, adds warning back, go back to square one (warnings are legally mandated). Mind that a lot of those warnings come about after drug testing and subsequent pharmacovigilance work. > Companies are welcome to have inspectors come in and certify that the drugs are safe, just like they do when ratings agencies rate their debts. Yes, because that works wonderfully. I'm sure all AAA bonds are solid (and that even with the SEC). Oh wait