2 ms·

> Your whataboutism argument isn't going very well. Gotcha. One rule for me and another for thee. It says a lot about people when they'd prefer to believe a c

> Your whataboutism argument isn't going very well. Gotcha. One rule for me and another for thee. It says a lot about people when they'd prefer to believe a comfortable lie, than be told an uncomfortable truth. I never once defended Musk's idiocy, but you've made it clear that you have no problems with child abuse, anti-Semitism, or hypocrisy. Best of luck to ya. > The End.

clouddrover 3y ago
What on earth are you talking about? You're bounding off into the irrelevant tundra, desperately hoping that it is somehow relevant to Disney not advertising on Twitter. It isn't.
- shark_laser 3y ago
  lol, gotcha. Commenting on Disney paying money to an antisemetic company that distributes child abuse material is irrelevant in a thread about Disney not paying money to an allegedly antisemetic company. Sorry, I suppose it's another "whataboutism"...
  - clouddrover 3y ago
    No, I don't think you've managed to get any of it. You are profoundly confused.
jmye 3y ago
> but you've made it clear that you have no problems with child abuse, anti-Semitism, or hypocrisy. What an absurdly childish response to GP’s comments. GP has made none of those things “clear” and it’s disgusting that you would stoop to such a gross, inflammatory accusation because you’re upset about an internet argument. Grow up or log off. This crap is a really, really ugly look for you.
- shark_laser 3y ago
  lol, gotcha. It's an ugly look for me to suggest that someone has strange priorities if they're defending Disney for paying money to an antisemetic company that distributes child abuse material? I guess we're only allowed to judge antisemetic companies if they're owned by Elon Musk... It's an ugly look for you to look the other way. Silence is violence remember.
  - jmye 3y ago
    No one you’ve responded to is defending Disney. No one is looking the other way. They’re telling you that you’re conflating unrelated things. You spinning that into “actually that means you approved of CSAM” is teenage Twitter bullshit, frankly. Again, grow up.
    - shark_laser 3y ago
      [flagged]

clouddrover 3y ago

What on earth are you talking about? You're bounding off into the irrelevant tundra, desperately hoping that it is somehow relevant to Disney not advertising on Twitter. It isn't.

shark_laser 3y ago
lol, gotcha. Commenting on Disney paying money to an antisemetic company that distributes child abuse material is irrelevant in a thread about Disney not paying money to an allegedly antisemetic company. Sorry, I suppose it's another "whataboutism"...
- clouddrover 3y ago
  No, I don't think you've managed to get any of it. You are profoundly confused.

jmye 3y ago

> but you've made it clear that you have no problems with child abuse, anti-Semitism, or hypocrisy. What an absurdly childish response to GP’s comments. GP has made none of those things “clear” and it’s disgusting that you would stoop to such a gross, inflammatory accusation because you’re upset about an internet argument. Grow up or log off. This crap is a really, really ugly look for you.

shark_laser 3y ago
lol, gotcha. It's an ugly look for me to suggest that someone has strange priorities if they're defending Disney for paying money to an antisemetic company that distributes child abuse material? I guess we're only allowed to judge antisemetic companies if they're owned by Elon Musk... It's an ugly look for you to look the other way. Silence is violence remember.
- jmye 3y ago
  No one you’ve responded to is defending Disney. No one is looking the other way. They’re telling you that you’re conflating unrelated things. You spinning that into “actually that means you approved of CSAM” is teenage Twitter bullshit, frankly. Again, grow up.
  - shark_laser 3y ago
    [flagged]