> I hope it does not persuade too many people. It's persuaded me, because it's true. Open-source is not a sustainable economic model, nor (with a few rare exce

> I hope it does not persuade too many people. It's persuaded me, because it's true. Open-source is not a sustainable economic model, nor (with a few rare exceptions) business model. > with open source software, they can rely on it not to disappear overnight if a company behind it vanishes. This is sustainable. You're intentionally conflating two very different uses of the word "sustainable". This is not what the poster meant.