4 ms·
Agree, should have had (2018) in it title (that's the year of the oldest file in the GitHub repo
by nmstoker 3y ago
Agree, should have had (2018) in it title (that's the year of the oldest file in the GitHub repo
- nmstoker 3y agoI suspect it's an accident/unintentional by Mozilla but it's kind of odd how it's written with literally no mention of project start/history (besides ONE mention of some action in 2022, when it was already 4 years old) I get that this happens with online articles trying to give a sense of being "current" but this is a little strange here.