3 ms·
I agree that this is obviously not what the question meant. My reading of the article is that the author was picking a bit of fun at the highway director's misu
by jsight 15y ago
I agree that this is obviously not what the question meant. My reading of the article is that the author was picking a bit of fun at the highway director's misunderstanding by including that. It's actually an interesting question, IMO.
- wiredfool 15y agoIt's less important in places like Massachusetts than in earthquake prone locations like Missouri, California or Washington. There, it's required that you have at least .3g worth of hold downs. (roughly anyway, it varies depending on the exact seismic zone)