3 ms·
Not really. They already chose to show the benchmark where it does best and even then it’s still quite a bit worse (though definitely impressive for its size).
by Version467 3y ago
Not really. They already chose to show the benchmark where it does best and even then it’s still quite a bit worse (though definitely impressive for its size).
If you take a look at other benchmarks, for example MMLU@5-shot then this does 46.3, while gpt-3.5 does 70.
But there might be some use cases where this one is close enough in performance and the difference in cost and speed make it a better choice.