You are making an imaginary distinction that doesn't exist. It doesn't even make any sense in the context of the paper i linked. The model consistently and pur

You are making an imaginary distinction that doesn't exist. It doesn't even make any sense in the context of the paper i linked. The model consistently and purposefully withheld knowledge it was directly aware of. This is lying under any useful definition of the word. You're veering off into meaningless philosophy that has no bearing on outcomes and results.