4 ms·
True. You’re merely forced to be subject to their decisions, made on behalf of and in the interest of people who aren’t you. [edit] I’m getting the sense that
by wharvle 3y ago
True. You’re merely forced to be subject to their decisions, made on behalf of and in the interest of people who aren’t you.
[edit] I’m getting the sense that if we just restructure this so the union exists and does normal union stuff but you don’t have to “be a member” (but do have to abide by its decisions or else leave, as with a board) you’d be ok with it? Like it’s mainly a semantic problem?
- throwawa14223 3y agoI see it as more than a semantic problem, but the problem does boil down to the membership. If they are the lawful structure I'll abide by their decisions, I just don't want to be forced to join.
- Apocryphon 3y agoSo it’s exactly the same as a union, in a situation where the union is the lawful structure of worker bodies in the country you’re working in.
- throwawa14223 3y agoI hate the idea. I've been in a union once and will never willingly do that again, but it would be more palatable if they couldn't claim me as a 'member'.