3 ms·

I agree. I was eager to contribute but saw the page and didn't do anything. The rewards just seemed kind of stingy and the target seemed high. It's software, ze

by jessep 14y ago

I agree. I was eager to contribute but saw the page and didn't do anything. The rewards just seemed kind of stingy and the target seemed high. It's software, zero replication cost. Everyone who contributes should get a copy, and additional rewards should encourage additional generosity.

icandoitbetter 14y ago
Similar experience.
subpixel 14y ago
$200k is presumptuous, really. If you look at the top-funded technology projects, they all have low goals and excessive results: http://kck.st/J7kUqn http://kck.st/J7kUqn A high goal on Kickstarter /is like a high price/ and seems to trigger similar supporter/customer behavior. When I saw the Light Table video on HN I flipped out. I want this! But when I saw this campaign something cooled my jets. I'm not sure I'd pay $50 if it was for sale right now. If I'm supporting its creation, and speculating at that, I need a more alluring price and/or a story that makes me forget about all price concerns. If I were the creator, I'd seriously consider pay-what-you-want.
- ibdknox 14y ago
  I would argue few are as ambitious either. To put this into perspective, the VS team is numbered in the thousands. We're talking a small team, but a team nonetheless, and it's hard to imagine being able to keep a team together for a year at less than 200k. In this case, it's not a matter of presumption, it's a matter of knowing the reality of what is involved in actually building this thing.
  - subpixel 14y ago
    If that's what it takes, by all means they should get it. I think the best advice then is to simply make the offer as remarkable as the ambition, so we all get on board. Edit: I did't mean to suggest the goal is unreasonable or unattainable. I was just trying to explain the not-positive reaction I had to seeing it. Like shopping, not all price reactions are logical.

3 ms·

I agree. I was eager to contribute but saw the page and didn't do anything. The rewards just seemed kind of stingy and the target seemed high. It's software, ze

by jessep 14y ago

icandoitbetter 14y ago
Similar experience.
subpixel 14y ago
$200k is presumptuous, really. If you look at the top-funded technology projects, they all have low goals and excessive results: http://kck.st/J7kUqn http://kck.st/J7kUqn A high goal on Kickstarter /is like a high price/ and seems to trigger similar supporter/customer behavior. When I saw the Light Table video on HN I flipped out. I want this! But when I saw this campaign something cooled my jets. I'm not sure I'd pay $50 if it was for sale right now. If I'm supporting its creation, and speculating at that, I need a more alluring price and/or a story that makes me forget about all price concerns. If I were the creator, I'd seriously consider pay-what-you-want.
- ibdknox 14y ago
  I would argue few are as ambitious either. To put this into perspective, the VS team is numbered in the thousands. We're talking a small team, but a team nonetheless, and it's hard to imagine being able to keep a team together for a year at less than 200k. In this case, it's not a matter of presumption, it's a matter of knowing the reality of what is involved in actually building this thing.
  - subpixel 14y ago
    If that's what it takes, by all means they should get it. I think the best advice then is to simply make the offer as remarkable as the ambition, so we all get on board. Edit: I did't mean to suggest the goal is unreasonable or unattainable. I was just trying to explain the not-positive reaction I had to seeing it. Like shopping, not all price reactions are logical.