2 ms·
On the contrary, it would simply put both companies and workers on the same standard. If workers want to use their power to pressure companies, so should compa
by johngladtj 3y ago
On the contrary, it would simply put both companies and workers on the same standard.
If workers want to use their power to pressure companies, so should companies be able to do the same.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> If workers want to use their power to pressure companies, so should companies be able to do the same Yes? Was this disputed?
- tuwtuwtuwtuw 3y ago> If workers want to use their power to pressure companies, so should companies be able to do the same. Why is that?
- turquoisevar 3y ago> On the contrary, it would simply put both companies and workers on the same standard. If by “same standard” you mean equal footing, then I don’t see how you’d square that circle. By definition an employer-employee relationship is asymmetrical, so is landlord-tenant, corporations-consumer, doctor-patient, teacher-student, etc. In all those relationships one has more leverage than the other. Which is why, in most developed nations, there are guardrails in an effort to equalize that relationship.