4 ms·
So first you sarcastically deride worker-governed companies as being a reinvention of entreneurship (capitalist). Then you deride it as being like “Venezuela” (
by avgcorrection 3y ago
So first you sarcastically deride worker-governed companies as being a reinvention of entreneurship (capitalist). Then you deride it as being like “Venezuela” (socialist bogeyman). I can’t make heads or tails of this.
- waihtis 3y agoNo, I'm choosing not to embrace some random subcategory of entrepreneurism you're trying hamfistedly promote. I have no problem with a group of people coming together to form a company, on the contrary it needs to be promoted and celebrated much more as an idea, but only if it lives and dies by market forces.
- avgcorrection 3y agoYou’re the one who picked the goddamn comparison. Then I said that the comparison isn’t valid since it’s worker-governed and owned. And now you complain that I’m choosing a particular subcategory against your will... for the thing that I said wasn’t a valid comparison to begin with!
- waihtis 3y agoI can't help but to think you don't understand even the very basic premises of forming a private company.
- defrost 3y agoPrivate companies aren't personal fiefdoms when they employ members of the general public in countries that support collective bargaining.
- waihtis 3y agoIf you're a major or founding shareholder in a company while simultaneously working there, you don't negotiate via collective bargaining mechanisms. You theoretically could, but it would be pure idiocy.
- avgcorrection 3y agoDeflection and sarcasm is all you have to offer.