4 ms·
It's because the top earners make obscene levels of money, and a union might disrupt that. So you have a situation where a company might only lose lower perform
by Salgat 3y ago
It's because the top earners make obscene levels of money, and a union might disrupt that. So you have a situation where a company might only lose lower performers to unionization, which they can afford to handle.
- w0m 3y agoPartly true. Unions are a way to balance power disparity between Owner and Worker. Currently, tech mostly has more work to be done than engineers to do said work - so the balance is tipped toward the individual. (At least in the US). Once that balance is tipped the other way, the value of Unions will go up dramatically.