3 ms·
As a thought experiment, I’m interested in people listing metadata that fits the legal definition and teasing out types that the public would probably not think
by joshspankit 3y ago
As a thought experiment, I’m interested in people listing metadata that fits the legal definition and teasing out types that the public would probably not think is metadata.
I’ll start first off the top of my head:
- The (real) identity of you and every person you talk to
- The time of the messages
- The location they were sent from
- The specific device used to send them
- A sentiment analysis: were the messages positive? Negative? Depressed? Anxious? Sarcastic?
- A description of the pictures that were sent (for example by an on-device AI model)
- A transcript of any voice memos/videos
- captn3m0 3y agoRaised elsewhere in this thread: hashes of media, maybe perceptive hashes sent and revived. Read receipts. User is typing indicators.
- joshspankit 3y ago> perceptive hashes And if you’re sending media they have on record that means they can look up the exact same media and still have it qualified as metadata