The lack of links to sources in that article is disturbing. Requiring users find each of their sources is evil, and I suspect intentional. I believe this might

The lack of links to sources in that article is disturbing. Requiring users find each of their sources is evil, and I suspect intentional. I believe this might be their source: https://www.creativefuture.org/new-study-the-size-and-scope-of-global-internet-piracy-is-on-the-rise-video/ https://www.creativefuture.org/new-study-the-size-and-scope-... Which links to a Los Angeles Times article [1] from 2013, but not the study. The Los Angeles Times article also lacks a link to the study quoted. According to Creative Future, the study came from NetNames [2]. I did find some other interesting [3] articles [4] published on the Creative Future site. [1]: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-fi-ct-piracy-bandwith-20130917-story.html https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-fi-... [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetNames https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetNames [3]: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Acreativefuture.org%2F+bandwidth https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Acreativefuture.org%2F+bandw... [4]: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Acreativefuture.org%2F+piracy https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Acreativefuture.org%2F+pirac... The NetNames site is no longer active however it was archived [5], the full report is missing. This is infuriating. If the study cannot be read, it might as well not exist. I found a Torrent Freak article from 2013 [6] with more details. [5]: https://web.archive.org/web/20131005143240/http://www.netnames.com/sizing_the_piracy_universe https://web.archive.org/web/20131005143240/http://www.netnam... [6]: https://torrentfreak.com/432-million-pirates-share-9567-petabytes-a-month-130917/ https://torrentfreak.com/432-million-pirates-share-9567-peta...