3 ms·
What kind of transparency are you missing? I think it's one of the most transparent projects the presidency has given about. You can access all the information
by meerita 3y ago
What kind of transparency are you missing? I think it's one of the most transparent projects the presidency has given about. You can access all the information publicly.
- RandomLensman 3y agoNot OP, but it reads like the broader costs of the bitcoin project are guesses (wallet development, promotion, ...), not published numbers - is that all available?
- misnome 3y agoAs I understand it, there is no public information on what is held and how profitable the endeavour has been, and the specific graph along with the tweet that is linked in this article is a third-part that merely estimates holdings?
- aredox 3y agoThe article talks at length of the total lack of transparency. The government spokesperson doesn't address the problem at all when probed.
- frereubu 3y agoThe only information on the actual Bitcoin holdings has been released in tweets by the president, which don't include anything like a Bitcoin wallet address, so there's no proof that the government actually owns them, and no public body is tracking those investments. If the article is true - and I have no reason to doubt those particular details - then this really feels like a "trust me, bro" situation.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]