3 ms·
Investors that buy houses just rent them out again, so the houses are not removed from the supply of housing, just moved from the homeowner's market to the rent
by esoterica 3y ago
Investors that buy houses just rent them out again, so the houses are not removed from the supply of housing, just moved from the homeowner's market to the rental market. There is nothing wrong with this - renters need a place to live too! The problem is the lack of overall housing, not the balance between homes to rent and buy.
The fact that it's profitable to buy homes and rent them out means that renters are currently overpaying relative to buyers, and shifting properties over to the rental market will help correct this inequality. If you advocate against this then you are arguing that renters should be screwed over the subsidize homebuyers.
If you want to screw over wall street you should build more homes to flood supply and tank the value of their investment. Of course many of the people who complain about Wall Street buying up homes are also NIMBYs who adamantly block all new housing because they are supply-and-demand deniers or vacancy truthers.
- gumballindie 3y ago> There is nothing wrong with this - renters need a place to live too! They wouldnt be renters if they could afford buying homes and that would make them home owners, living in their own homes not someone else’s.
- esoterica 3y agoThis is just wrong, there are many people who rent for non financial reasons (e.g they plan on moving within a few years). Just because you’ve chosen to nest in the same place until you die doesn’t mean everyone wants to.
- soupfordummies 3y agoA lot of times they just buy em and let em sit too though. A lot more than individuals since large corps can afford to do that.
- JamesBarney 3y agoIs there any evidence of that? The last thing any landlord I've ever talked to wanted was for a property to sit empty.
- konschubert 3y agoWhy would they do that?