I don't know why he rails against English. Computer programming uses a small subset of English in code and the industry nearly always uses the American socio-c

I don't know why he rails against English. Computer programming uses a small subset of English in code and the industry nearly always uses the American socio-cultural kind of English. English is the fullest language we have, with all the infamy of pilfered concepts from the European continent. The language/natural language distinction is reductionist, halving all language, when in reality it is a structure that cannot be halved. He recommends reducing languages down to their most basic elements. This is a mistake that doesn't go anywhere. You end up with a pile of sticks. All his crictisms of English (one voice, limited understanding, ect) can be leveled at any living, breathing human. I wonder where the experiment goes. His criticisms of English should be better.