A-ha, thanks! Hadn't looked at or heard of the referenced paper, but yeah, sounds like it's almost certainly also 5-shot then. It would've been more consistent

A-ha, thanks! Hadn't looked at or heard of the referenced paper, but yeah, sounds like it's almost certainly also 5-shot then. It would've been more consistent to call it e.g. "5-shot w/ CoT@32" in that case, but I guess there's only so much you can squeeze into a table.