3 ms·
> This one always cracks me up. It doesn't crack me up. Our funding for fusion has always been below the "fusion never" line on the graph. https://pbs.twimg.c
by bsder 3y ago
> This one always cracks me up.
It doesn't crack me up.
Our funding for fusion has always been below the "fusion never" line on the graph.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWQaKc8XEAAAVmZ.jpg:large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWQaKc8XEAAAVmZ.jpg:large
If only we had as much funding for fusion as we do for Skinner boxes ...
- bastawhiz 3y agoThe Chicago police department gets more annual funding than fusion (in 2012), according to that graph. Wild.
- mcmoor 3y agoIt seems to me that there's fewer believable research proposal than predicted
- fnordpiglet 3y agoSo, instead of buying twitter, a single man could have “bought” us fusion for all, instead he brought us X.
- namlem 3y agoHe got us super heavy lift orbital rockets, I'm not complaining.
- avmich 3y ago> Our funding for fusion has always been below the "fusion never" line on the graph. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWQaKc8XEAAAVmZ.jpg:large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWQaKc8XEAAAVmZ.jpg:large But the Lawson criterion progress is there: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/Fustion_triple-product_diagram_Horvath.webp/709px-Fustion_triple-product_diagram_Horvath.webp.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/Fu...