2 ms·
You're probably being downvoted unfairly because of the reference to the fiat currency conspiracism. But to treat your actual point: That's an extremely cherr
by ajross 3y ago
You're probably being downvoted unfairly because of the reference to the fiat currency conspiracism. But to treat your actual point:
That's an extremely cherry-picked date. 1970 was the bottom a deep trough in gold prices. If you look just a few years in either direction, it was 50% higher. You would have had to aim your investment with shocking precision to even get close to stocks in terms of returns. If you look back to 1940, you'll see that gold has returned about 1.2% in real value, which is significantly less than bank interest. Gold has been losing money, on balance, in the power-war world.
See: https://www.macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart https://www.macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-...
It's a volatile asset, so you can always play games with dates to make it look like a good thing. But it's not. It's a sucker's bet, and I stand by that. Buy a mutual fund.