>If you want to increase the odds of not dying as a pedestrian, you need to be on the lookout. Nobody in this thread is disagreeing with this statement. Again

>If you want to increase the odds of not dying as a pedestrian, you need to be on the lookout. Nobody in this thread is disagreeing with this statement. Again, you are creating a false binary, where you seem to think either one party or the other is responsible for traveling safely. That is false. Walking alertly and safely improves a pedestrian's chances of being safe, but it does not guarantee their safety.