2 ms·
I think it makes sense not to include it to the license. Such solutions cause additional cost just by the needed computing power, which the customer needs to pa
by andix 3y ago
I think it makes sense not to include it to the license. Such solutions cause additional cost just by the needed computing power, which the customer needs to pay for. So the cost of the JetBrians license needs to include that in the long term.
If one would like to use another AI tool like Copilot they would still need to pay for JetBrains AI.
In a lot of environments Coding AI usage is not allowed or even possible (no internet access), and would just be a cost driver without any benefit.
- dzhiurgis 3y ago"A lot" are not allowed? Most of places who disallow AI assistants will also happily pay exorbitant rates to consultants who will publish all your code base publicly on git... And how many offline coders are out there? My guess is less than 1%?
- andix 3y agoIt’s not just about offline coders. A lot of companies have a policy that code can’t leave their internal systems. No GitHub, no OpenAI, just internal tools. Far more than 1% of developers are affected with that. But let’s take it from another perspective: you will be happier if jetbrains increases the prices 100$ per year and AI is included instead of having an optional 100$ payment?
- bdavbdav 3y agoCome work in finance. No external services.