3 ms·

I believe both of your complaints have the same underlying cause: they are Linux-centric (that goes extra for the "container story" part since I doubt very seri

I believe both of your complaints have the same underlying cause: they are Linux-centric (that goes extra for the "container story" part since I doubt very seriously that you have a use case for running containerized Darwin executables) I believe Apple's version of FUSE is https://developer.apple.com/documentation/fileprovider/nonreplicated_file_provider_extension https://developer.apple.com/documentation/fileprovider/nonre... and, while I am absolutely certain someone will point out things that FUSE has that the macOS version doesn't, I'm only saying that, just like Windows, macOS has its own way of doing things and thus very little incentive to implement someone else's vision

tambourine_man 3y ago
Apple goes to great lengths to increase security while annoying its users. Containers could help in that regard. Having an app (and GUI too) run in a container of sorts could avoid the countless dialog boxes we’ve grown accustomed to. Regarding FUSE, there have been many implementations for macOS, just not very good ones. I don’t see a fundamental limitation on XNU, Darwin, Mach. I haven’t though of File Provider in this way, but maybe it’s a good solution. Apple seems reasonably committed to it so that’s encouraging.