Cherry picking things someone says or endorses which aren't anti-semetic doesn't explain the things they say or endorse which are anti-semetic. I have no idea h

Cherry picking things someone says or endorses which aren't anti-semetic doesn't explain the things they say or endorse which are anti-semetic. I have no idea how someone comes to believe "look over there" is a defense for explicitly endorsing an anti-semetic conspiracy theory. This is like pointing out that a murderer went their whole life up until the alleged murder doing stuff that wasn't murdering (as far as we know), and has done so since, too (as far as we know), so how can they be a murderer? It's worth noting, too, like the killer, the examples we know of are just the examples we know of. If there's part of the interview where he admits he endorsed an anti-semetic conspiracy theory, and was wrong to do so (not just that it was a mistake) and explains how he came to endorse an anti-semetic conspiracy theory, and how he now rejects the anti-semetic conspiracy theory and the anti-semites who subscribe to it, perhaps he should put that info into the format and platform that he used to endorse an anti-semetic conspiracy theory.