3 ms·
I assume these landing pages are made for wall st analysts rather than people who understand LLM eval methods.
by polygamous_bat 3y ago
I assume these landing pages are made for wall st analysts rather than people who understand LLM eval methods.
- bryanh 3y agoTrue, but even some of the apples to apples is favorable to Gemini Ultra 90.04% CoT@32 vs. GPT-4 87.29% CoT@32 (via API).
- dongobread 3y agoThis isn't apples to apples - they're taking the optimal prompting technique for their own model, then using that technique for both models. They should be comparing it against the optimal prompting technique for GPT-4.
- rockinghigh 3y agoShowing dominance in AI is also targeted at their entreprise customers who spend millions on Google Cloud services.