3 ms·

Yes and if you look at that book and see a naked woman then it's more telling about you than anyone else.

verdverm 3y ago
our biology primes us to see these things, our lizard brain is quite powerful despite the belief we can live above it. > it's more telling about you than anyone else I'll reflect this back to you and your statement. Making such statements says quite a bit about how you see and treat people I'd also note that I did write I didn't see it the first time, and only saw it after another commenter pointed it out. (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38544483 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38544483)
- sigzero 3y ago
  "out biology primes us..." but "I didn't see it the first time, and only saw it after another commenter pointed it out."
  - verdverm 3y ago
    part 1 addresses the general premiss that if you see sexual imagery in a non-sexual image, then there is <something> about you part 2 addresses the personalization of the accusation
  - PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y ago
    exact same for me, although after seeing it I do have a difficult time believing it was accidental. But I also don't care, it doesn't bother me at all.
- that_guy_iain 3y ago
  > I'll reflect this back to you and your statement. Making such statements says quite a bit about how you see and treat people What I suspect is you haven't looked at a picture of the actual book cover and therefore haven't realised that it looks rather different in action.
systems 3y ago
this is a good example of gaslighting and it is usually how those visual illusions are used, if you see this than you are that, but if you see the other thing you are normal its a bad image, it is a visual illusion, are they aware of it or not this is the question
- that_guy_iain 3y ago
  This is not a good example of gaslighting. If you look at the actual book cover and you see that, then it's very telling. If you look at the image on the blog post and see it, it's different. The book cover images are missing quite a bit of it and the parts where it cuts off are quite import to an illusion.
tokai 3y ago
You two need to calm down.
nor-and-or-not 3y ago
It may not be obvious if you're just looking at the book. But if the images of the front and back are put together side by side, like in the post, I think it's quite obvious. I'd be surprised if this wasn't intentional.
nkozyra 3y ago
What would it be "telling" exactly? That someone recognizes the general shape of a naked woman?

our biology primes us to see these things, our lizard brain is quite powerful despite the belief we can live above it. > it's more telling about you than anyone else I'll reflect this back to you and your statement. Making such statements says quite a bit about how you see and treat people I'd also note that I did write I didn't see it the first time, and only saw it after another commenter pointed it out. (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38544483 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38544483)

sigzero 3y ago
"out biology primes us..." but "I didn't see it the first time, and only saw it after another commenter pointed it out."
- verdverm 3y ago
  part 1 addresses the general premiss that if you see sexual imagery in a non-sexual image, then there is <something> about you part 2 addresses the personalization of the accusation
- PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y ago
  exact same for me, although after seeing it I do have a difficult time believing it was accidental. But I also don't care, it doesn't bother me at all.
that_guy_iain 3y ago
> I'll reflect this back to you and your statement. Making such statements says quite a bit about how you see and treat people What I suspect is you haven't looked at a picture of the actual book cover and therefore haven't realised that it looks rather different in action.

systems 3y ago

this is a good example of gaslighting and it is usually how those visual illusions are used, if you see this than you are that, but if you see the other thing you are normal its a bad image, it is a visual illusion, are they aware of it or not this is the question

that_guy_iain 3y ago
This is not a good example of gaslighting. If you look at the actual book cover and you see that, then it's very telling. If you look at the image on the blog post and see it, it's different. The book cover images are missing quite a bit of it and the parts where it cuts off are quite import to an illusion.

tokai 3y ago

You two need to calm down.

nor-and-or-not 3y ago

It may not be obvious if you're just looking at the book. But if the images of the front and back are put together side by side, like in the post, I think it's quite obvious. I'd be surprised if this wasn't intentional.

nkozyra 3y ago

What would it be "telling" exactly? That someone recognizes the general shape of a naked woman?