> Is the law actionable? Yup. I'm pretty willing to defer to what human rights organizations and the country itself say about their laws. > Weed is illegal in

> Is the law actionable? Yup. I'm pretty willing to defer to what human rights organizations and the country itself say about their laws. > Weed is illegal in the Netherlands. Which: 1. is something that should change if it's an inaccurate reflection of the country 2. is nonetheless a far discussion from (what should be) a fundamental human right > If you don't know the reality of the situation then maybe you shouldn't act at all because you're ignorant about the entire thing? The Python Software Foundation didn't act on enabling this conference; that's precisely why the OP exists. Your argument, if you're defending the OP, is instead that we should act on our supposed "ignorance" in the face of laws which say one thing and internet people say another thing.