3 ms·
Sender, and receiver pays them to pay that. So in this scenario the users of Twitch should pay for the sender to be able to send data. I see no reason why Twitc
by Ekaros 3y ago
Sender, and receiver pays them to pay that. So in this scenario the users of Twitch should pay for the sender to be able to send data. I see no reason why Twitch would not be charging for using their service in this scenario. And then viewer can pay for it.
- specialist 3y agoThe next logical step: customer gets free ISP. The complaint is that ISPs are charging both sides. Hence the pro "net neutrality" position. (Aside: "Net neutrality" is a terrible phrase. Obscures rather than illuminates the policy debate.)