3 ms·
> I'm surprised even Shazam still makes commercial sense. Isn’t Shazam owned by Apple now? It doesn’t need to make “financial sense” if it’s a service Apple ru
by TerrifiedMouse 3y ago
> I'm surprised even Shazam still makes commercial sense.
Isn’t Shazam owned by Apple now? It doesn’t need to make “financial sense” if it’s a service Apple runs.
- Racing0461 3y agoI disagree. Apple isn't like Google/FB where they take a loss on a service and make it back on the backend with ads. Apple seems like they evaluate each service as if it were a physical product ie it costs X and each service needs to stand on its own and make X + Y back.