3 ms·
I agree. After receiving a C&D from Meta for my OSS project (along with some other maintainers from some other projects) I strongly believe adversarial interop
by smashah 3y ago
I agree. After receiving a C&D from Meta for my OSS project (along with some other maintainers from some other projects) I strongly believe adversarial interop is a basic digital right that is required to fulfil the broken or revoked promises of web 2.0
If you know anybody that can help please let me know because I want to get back to maintaining the project.
- wslh 3y agoDid you contact specific organizations such as FSF, EFF, etc and/or specialized lawyers? There were well known people defending itself or being plaintiffs. For example, https://cr.yp.to/export.html https://cr.yp.to/export.html
- rezonant 3y agoWhat is the project? On what grounds did they C&D you?
- smashah 3y agoHere's a write up of the legal threats timeline to our projects and how it coincides with their in house development of an npm package: https://gist.github.com/smashah/667d4d5cf31670ee87547450861a603b https://gist.github.com/smashah/667d4d5cf31670ee87547450861a... They sent us C&Ds based on ToS. Meta has done this before to insta and android devs. Some never came back to their projects. It causes insane amount of stress and depression amongst the devs I've spoken with who went through the same thing.