3 ms·
If the outcomes are the same you can certainly equate the outcomes and if the intent is the same, such as to limit consumption, then you can certainly equate th
by 378474r9r 3y ago
If the outcomes are the same you can certainly equate the outcomes and if the intent is the same, such as to limit consumption, then you can certainly equate the intent as well. After the intent and the outcome I don't really see how the rest is anything but execution details.
- jncfhnb 3y agoExecution details are salient. Outcomes are higher dimensioned than what you describe.
- defrost 3y agoThe intent is to limit waste not consumption. There is a difference that you're not seeing. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38538799 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38538799
- 378474r9r 3y agoYou're arguing execution details. I don't think the original post was saying this was literally the same thing just that it effectively is. Your argument around intent is largely a reframing that serves to sidestep the obvious disparate impact angles on the matter. "The intent isn't to stifle consumption that's just a predictable consequence of our intent" is an extremely shallow rebuttal.